Rethinking Human Evolution: How Collaboration, Language, and Ecologies of Care Challenge Capitalist Dogma

The human capacity for language serves fundamentally to improve understanding and trust, fostering collaboration instead of competition. This foundational reality directly contradicts capitalist interpretations of evolution and reinforces the growing scientific and cultural recognition of human cooperation. Modern society’s rigid hierarchical structures and wealth-extraction methods perpetuate widespread exploitation, creating systemic societal sickness. To heal from this collective malaise, observers argue that society must rediscover faith in humanity, step away from hypercompetitive paradigms, and focus on building trustworthy, life-affirming relationships within human-scale ecologies of care.

Being Human

Framing evolutionary processes in terms of collaborative niche construction rather than relentless competition is firmly grounded in what contemporary science understands about the cooperative tendencies of human toddlers. The notion of life as a competitive game only found its way into mainstream biological science by interpreting Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution through the specific cultural lens of capitalism.

The complementary perspective of life and evolution as an inherently cooperative game—as described by Pyotr Alexeyevich Kropotkin in his 1902 work Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution—was largely ignored in developed capitalist societies throughout most of the 20th century. Through the lenses of evolutionary biology and cultural evolution, small groups of 20 to 100 people represent the primary functional organisms within human society, contrasting sharply with isolated individuals, massive corporations, and centralized nation-states. The implications of this realization for modern civilization are profound.

Humanity is currently experiencing a critical phase transition catalyzed by a combination of unprecedented communication technologies, toxic levels of social inequality, and overlapping existential crises. Experts suggest it is time to harness ubiquitous global digital connectivity to curate and share lessons from marginalized perspectives, while reflecting critically on the human evolutionary journey and the true possibilities and limitations of human agency.

In the book The Beauty of Collaboration at Human Scale, author Jorn Bettin argues that becoming conscious of human cognitive and emotional limits—and recognizing that these boundaries are just as real, immutable, and relevant for human survival as the laws of physics—may finally allow society to embark on a path of radical energy descent. The journey of exponentially accelerating cultural evolution spans several hundred thousand years, tracking the origins of humanity right up to the significant developments of the early 21st century. The work seeks to equip communities and individuals with the conceptual tools needed to create resilient organizations capable of channeling value out of a dying ideological system and into an emerging world.

Being Part of a Healthy Cultural Organism

The human capacity for language would not have provided any evolutionary adaptive advantage if its primary purpose were deception or hyper-competition. Instead, language evolved fundamentally to improve the human ability to understand, trust, and rely on one another, ensuring that every individual within a cultural organism contributes unique capabilities and lived experiences to the collective whole.

Being part of the Earth in good company – our shared humanity

The relational nature of the broader cycle of life is obscured whenever society attempts to define cultural organisms merely as isolated groups of people or detached biological units. Humans and all other conscious beings make sense of the world in entirely relational terms. When paying close attention, humans even relate meaningfully to the food they consume and to elements that are conventionally dismissed as inanimate within Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. The extent to which people feel healthy, well, and alive is a direct reflection of the health and aliveness embedded in all their relationships, as well as their capacity to minimize cognitive dissonance across those connections.

Values and preferences do not develop in isolation, but emerge dynamically within a living social context. Values operate as a second-order cultural process, representing the derivative that surfaces from ongoing attempts to minimize cognitive dissonance across personal relationships. Conversely, the concept of the sovereign "self" is largely recognized as a WEIRD cultural artifact—an abstraction that neoliberal and neocolonial dogmas dictate should be valued above all else.

A much healthier approach understands the self through deeply held values forged by lived experiences within an embedded ecology of care. In a healthy ecology of care, personal values align closely with those of immediate peers and community members. In an unhealthy ecology, values may be shaped by chronic cognitive dissonance and exposure to systemic harm, eventually compelling individuals to seek out healthier environments.

Appreciating Timeless Patterns of Human Limitations

Modern society has been deliberately constructed such that certain forms of economic exploitation are deemed acceptable, legal, and necessary, while other forms of interpersonal harm are classified as unacceptable and illegal. Upon closer examination, this boundary is largely arbitrary. Laws and social norms in industrialized societies are heavily shaped by the underlying metaphor of society as a factory and human beings as replaceable machines.

WEIRD educational models focus heavily on transforming playful, curious children into self-conscious economic units prepared to navigate a competitive marketplace. Similarly, orthodox psychology is largely preoccupied with cultivating a healthy, hyper-individualized self ready to engage in the game of earning a living. Meanwhile, modern medicine increasingly addresses the long-term chronic stress experienced by individuals who are entirely detached from healthy ecologies of care.

Within the digital technoverse, biological life is frequently treated as secondary or obsolete. Unhelpful industrial metaphors confuse first-order biological realities—such as the innate human inclination toward mutual aid—with second-order cultural normalization of social power gradients. Societies that construct money as interest-bearing debt rely heavily on economic drivers that normalize exploiting others for personal gain, including taking personal credit for collective achievements. These exploitative interdependencies are treated as standard operating procedure, to the extent that individuals who successfully extract wealth from others are paradoxically labeled as "independent."

Being part of the Earth in good company – our shared humanity

Realistic paths to social success typically involve climbing hierarchies within rigid organizations or participating in legal, highly structured wealth-extraction systems. People retaining an intact moral compass frequently discover that traditional investments, charities, or conventional entrepreneurship often reinforce the existing status-quo of economic inequality. Consequently, honest individuals—and particularly neurodivergent people—find themselves systematically disadvantaged by social norms tailored exclusively to the dominant economic paradigm.

The modern global civilization is hypernormative, prioritizing anthropocentric, performance-driven cultures deeply anchored in social power hierarchies. The English language uses a single word—perform—to describe both artistic expression and the execution of externally evaluated economic criteria. In highly competitive environments where individuals are assigned a net worth, life ceases to be experienced as an ecological process and is instead transformed into a continuous performance measured by abstract algorithms.

Denying Timeless Patterns of Human Limitations

In many modern engineering and technical domains, a culture of normalized denial has taken root, summarized by the prevailing philosophy to "shut up and calculate." This attitude dominates machine learning, finance, and financial engineering, effectively institutionalizing the obscurity of systemic harm by dismissing negative impacts as insignificant externalities.

Addressing wealth inequality alone remains insufficient to heal the widespread human and ecological suffering driven by fossil-fuel exploitation. Eliminating wealth disparities without fundamentally shifting cultural practices, reducing consumption, and altering humanity’s relationship with the natural world will not reverse ecological overshoot or the ongoing biodiversity crisis. Humanity currently consumes natural resources at a rate 1.7 times faster than Earth’s ecosystems can regenerate. Even a significant deceleration of modern busyness will not suffice; an equal distribution of wealth within an energy-hungry, materialistic consumer society would still overwhelm planetary boundaries.

Modern addictions to convenience and consumption continually discount quality in favor of endless quantities that can be easily commodified and sold as progress. Concepts like enough have vanished from mainstream economic vocabularies. Rather than tinkering with yet another configuration of powerful, centralized institutions, critics argue that society would be better served by practicing de-powered dialogue and learning how to de-power relationships from the ground up, independent of official sanction.

Living in a Sick, Addicted Culture

In a hypernormative society, neurodivergence inevitably assumes a political dimension. Framing neurodivergent experiences as pathological allows mainstream systems to dismiss inconvenient perspectives as irrelevant. Observers note that historical figures who challenged competitive paradigms, such as mathematician John Nash during his work on cooperative game theory, faced severe marginalization and institutionalization.

Being part of the Earth in good company – our shared humanity

For decades, competitive market models utilized by mainstream economists have struggled to account for intrinsic human compassion, relying instead on assumptions of self-interest that treat human beings as isolated economic calculation engines. The concept of homo economicus functions not as an immutable law of nature, but as a self-fulfilling prophecy resulting from collective cultural choices.

The innate collaborative tendencies observed in human toddlers directly contradict the core assumptions of orthodox economic theory. Embracing a framework of collaborative niche construction allows human potential to contribute to the living planet rather than deplete it. As the late anthropologist David Graeber observed, human beings possess a profound psychological need not just to be cared for, but an even stronger innate drive to care for others and for the living world around them.

Being Alive and Part of the Living Planet

Humanity only survived alongside formidable apex predators through advanced collaboration and the use of symbolic language to understand intentions and coordinate actions. Symbolic language evolved primarily to foster trust and mutual reliance in life-or-death situations, rather than to facilitate ruthless internal competition.

Building on these insights, researchers and advocates continue to curate frameworks centered around human-scale ecologies of care and the restoration of sacred, trustworthy relationships beyond purely human boundaries. As biologist Janine Benyus notes, true evolutionary success in the natural world is defined not by short-term dominance, but by the continuity of life over thousands of generations—a feat achieved by organisms that learn to actively create and maintain conditions conducive to life.

Across the globe, small-scale initiatives continue to re-conceptualize human societies in compassionate, life-affirming ways that draw upon timeless indigenous wisdom and ecological interconnectedness. Healing begins with rediscovering faith in humanity, recognizing that the sacred cycle of life encompasses community, mutual support, and the eventual return of nutrients to a regenerative planet. By moving away from hypercompetitive performance metrics and embracing collaborative, omni-directional learning, communities can begin to construct alternative ecologies of care that honor both human diversity and the broader living world.

Share:

rifanmuazin writes for Stepping Stones Center.